Group Communication: Monkey Business or Facism?

A group can broadly be defined as:

"a collection of individuals who, as a result of interacting with one another over time, become interdependent, debeloping shared patterns of behaviour and a collective identity" - Trenholm (2004) .

It is thus clear that communication between colleagues at the workplace, better known as office politics, constitutes a great deal of group communication. In any workplace, we assume that employers seek synergy between their staff and co-workers. In modern mega-corporations, Human Resources tend to have specific requires in the hire of new employees. Specifically, they seek potential staff that encompass various characteristics such that a balance may be struck and that all "roles" of the office can be filled up. By "roles", i refer to the need to have a handful of leaders while at the same time also having a large body of maintainance roles to help support the leadership. Only when such an ideal demographic is sought in the office may there then be optimal efficiency in productivity.

However, having the right people in the right amounts will just not be enough. As can be seen from the video, an office, no matter how well equipped or well staffed, may still turn out to be a Zoo if no common identity and/or objectives have been established. It is necessary to have sincere and positive interaction between colleagues at work to expedite work processes. Colleagues should not mock or undermine the abilities of their coworkers as this may arise in resentment and conflict. Moreover, a group cannot rely just on one member should it want to achieve effective productivity standards. The effect of having members of a group perform below expectations because they assume others will perform more than is required is known as Social Loafing.

The fact is, we cannot just assume that the inherent Group Pressure will help motivate members into performing optimally. Instead, we should practice effective Group Socialisation, whereby members will take the initiative in approaching others for help, so that members can serve to ultimately support and complement each other, thus achieveing the common goal. This is especially true in the context of the workplace as there is tendency to overlook the individual or even group needs of co-workers. Such insensitivity may prove dire in the competitive environment of the corporate world.

Nonetheless, we should be aware that at the other end of the spectrum of group communication, an excessive obession with regard to practicing Group Synergy may eventually result in a regrettable occurance of the Groupthink phenomenon. Like the picture above suggests, employers tend not to get honest opinions from employees in the event that the staff feel it more beneficial to appear cohesive than be actually so. This is unfortunate as it will deprive the firm of a diverse range of ideas and opinions and thus may ultimately cause it to lose it competitive edge.

It is clear that effective Group Communications are necessary and highly desired at the workplace. Nonetheless we should all avoid exerting too much pressure to achieve unanimity so as to avoid Groupthink

How do you think we can achieve an optimal balance in Group Communication?

"Mein Kampf" - The man who betrayed the World

The world is without debate, a much better place void of Fascism...

Before i continue, perhaps you should all know that this post has been inspired by the recently released historical blockbuster starring Tom Cruise : Valkyrie





For those of you who have absolutely no idea what all this may all be about, Valkyrie depicts the events in late 1944 in which a conspiracy was hatched amongst the top German officials to absolve the world of Hitler's reign. Operation Valkyrie (pronounced Wal-Ku-Re in german) was thus used as a platform for which an attempted coup was launched to wrestle supreme command away from the dictator. Nonetheless, this post is by no means, about the movie. Instead, it is about the man who inspired the movie - Adolf Hitler.

Nonetheless, this post is by no means, about the movie. Instead, it is about the man who inspired the movie - Adolf Hitler.

By comparison to most Germans, Adolf Hitler was a man of small stature and awkward appearance yet throughout his reign as Supreme Chancellor, he carried himself with and air of bolstering confidence. Moreover, Hitler had been a commoner and had served as a soldier, suffering in the trenches during the first Great War and was thus familiar with the plight of the common German society when he rose to power. Thus, every Bavarian held utmost respect for him as it was felt that he carried the epitome of Nazi Power and leadership. To his closest Aides, Hitler practiced transparency in his policy making and interpersonal communication, thus making him so highly respected that many would die for him. In fact, the Nazis were so in awe of him that their pledge placed their absolute obedience to him and not to the country.

Moreover, the Fuhrer founded his Nazi regime and gathered support through sheer leadership. In a time where Germany was at its weakest, constantly bullied by its neighbors, Hitler demonstrated political competency by rallying the hearts and minds of the German people and gave direction for the prosperity of his beloved nation. Thus, Hiler integrated the German people and manged to bond them into one massive fascist movement. His motives were thought to be of the best interest of the people but in doing so, he nonetheless expected reciprocity, liking and also absolute obedience from them.

Nonetheless, we now all know that his actions had all been a facade to rally power into his grasp. This power was used to create a military socialist regime that Hitler then used to create his idea of a "master race". Utilizing mass murder and military conquest as his tools, Adolf Hitler justified his acts as the peoples' solution to the dilution of German society. In doing such acts of sheer atrocity, he offended the world and also betrayed humanity. These subsequently resulted in the ultimate defeat of the German people, bringing about constant suffering and poverty due to the Allied bombings and invasion.

These pictures depict the extent of destruction in the the German city of Dresden caused by Allied bombings :

In my opinion, Adolf Hitler was but a cheat whom utterly betrayed the trust of his people. He used flowery political tactics in order to first harness loyalty and gather support, but subsequently abused these and made promises which he failed to deliver.

In addition, his twisted mind and sly political agenda brought the world into turmoil and instead of liberating his countrymen, he brought only suffering upon them. This results in gradual disassociation by his top commanders and patriotic politicians and ultimately, relational dissolution from the closest aides around him. Eventually, his men hated him so much that 15 assasination attempts were plotted and carried out agaisnt him by men he had once dearly trusted.

The lesson to be had here is to always screen and filter content in communication, especially interpersonal. We ought to think for ourselves and not form allegiances solely based on the perception or even on fear, even to a dictator as it may be us who pay the ultimate price. On the other hand, if you were a dictator, do not be too trusting about the men around you; especially if you were a "bad" dictator because you never know when loyalties could turn. Not everything may seem like what it is.

From both historical notes and even abstracts of the film, it is clearly evident that the German people were filled with both vigour and fortitude and were indeed a sophisticated society that practiced honorable values. However, with the arrival of the Nazi regime came turmoil and unrest. Thus, the ultimate pity is that perhaps Hitler's rise to power was the German peoples' fall from grace during one of history's darkest periods.

Food for thought:
With the death of Fascism, along with Hitler, many of us believe ourselves to be roaming in a free world. Yet we do not realise that perhaps some existing government models are highly similar to the Nazi Party and we are perhaps but pawns of "Dictatorship". What do you think?

Need A New Job??

Non Verbal Communication is defined as communication that occurs when stimuli other than words creates meaning in the mind of the communicator and thus, is largely non-linguistic. As such, I believe that we can all agree that this superbowl ad for monster.com is largely non-verbal in nature and actually is quite good, albeit humorous, at bringing forth its key advertising message.

My interpretation of the commercial is as such:

Beginning from the outside of the building, the camera pans in a circular manner, first revealing the largely classy and well-furnished office of a professional executive dressed in suit. The decor of this office consists of antique solid red wood furniture, with a moose head mantle piece being the centre of attraction and it is evident that the suited man is rather idle. The camera then continues to pan, in the next room which reveals a shabby and messy office setting with a single office staff. Here, we see something unusual, in that the remaining half of the moose stands adorned on the office table. Obviously, this is not something we see every day and does in fact, have an underlying meaning.

Firstly, this commercial clearly utilizes Objectics (the study of how meanings are conveyed through artefacts), the moose being the centre piece. It is evidently split into 2 parts to convey the idea that bosses in the private sector tend to be glorified and host a relatively dignified appearance. On the other hand, staff holding lower vocations under these bosses tends to get the rather undignified end of the job scope, and this is clearly portrayed when the office staff looks upon the rear end of the moose and winces, imposing an element of "arse" in his daily work. The advertisement also makes use of Kinesics, portraying the body language of both the boss and the staff distinctly, of course with the office worker looking shaggy and haphazard while the boss looks idle and confident. Moreover, there is also an element of Paralinguistics (vocal non-verbal cues) that can be sensed in the use of music and sound effects. The rather dignified setting of the bosses's office is accompanied by soprano singing whereas that of the office is mated only to the sounds as heard in the daily grind of endless work.

All these elements come together to form a successful non-verbal communication which is both Normative and idiosyncratic, which basically means that the subject as portrayed in this ad consists of cues that have socially agreed upon meanings. Afterall, I am sure that most society's white collar workers can identify with the setting as portrayed in the commercial.

I feel that this particular commercial is really effective because it first uses all these non-verbal cues to help the audience recognise something that is familiar, before it ends of with text that then bring forth the key message. Such organisation not only helps to create impact, but also an element of suspense in that the audience does not really know what the "product" is till the very end.

Hope you liked the clip as much as I did! .... Stay tuned!

Chinese History... Reinvented!

Released early this year as the sequel to a two-part Feature Film, Red Cliff 2 completes the tale of the historic battle at red cliff between the rebels and the imperial army during China's Warring States period. Prior to its release, the film had been accompanied by a massive marketing campaign that aimed to project the epic as the must watch movie of the season. Nonetheless, most asians would surely not be strangers to the story of the Romance of the Three kingdoms, of which the plot clearly had been adapted from. In fact, critics had come forth to denounce the authenticity and accuracy of its plot due to numerous historic discrepancies that arose as the plot unfolded. Yet, this 2 part feature film remains a success. So, how exactly has it appealed to today's modern audience?

Foremost, being somewhat familiar to most asians, the storyline had already managed to sell itself and perhaps it is this familiarity that helps identify with the passive audience. Moreover, the relatively long plot has been significantly "modernised" by injecting loads of humour and tons of "wisecracking" within its dialogue. The makers of the movie obviously understand that the movie would be largely unappealing if coupled with stale, draggy dialogue.

In addition, the film appealed to the audience through the use of Cognitive Schematics and also the creation of Perceptions early in the movie. The director has successfully managed to cast the key characters as objectfully as possible. For example, Cao Cao the key villain, appeared awe-inspiring and majestic as the prime minister, almost godly with the ability to weild the power of a massive army. The rebels on the other hand, were depicted as closly-knit, un-wavering and never flinching in the face superior enemy forces. Clearly, Personal Contructs have been defined. This helps create a contrast at the climax of the movie when key character traits all fall apart as the battle is at its most intense.

The last and perhaps most appealing trait of the Red Cliff epic would perhaps be the way its plot is left hanging at key junctures. By this, i refer to the way the film causes the audience to ponder for a moment as to the particularly implicit way dialogues of actions are carried out. Many a times, strategic and tactical decisions made by the rebels seemed to defy logic yet no explanation is evident until the very moment success has been accomplished. This concept of Closure stimulates the mostly passive audience into pre-empting the movie's ending by only providing them with minimal information. Also, the film clearly employs the principle of Figure and Ground implicitly entwined in its plot as it causes the audience to largely miss the insignificant interactions while only focusing on the major battle. Needless to say, these "insignificant" details become decisive tactics at the very end.

For those of you whom have not watched this great film, well you definetly ought to. Nevetheless I don't mind letting you in a bit of the ending: the big baddie Cao Cao succumbed to defeat purely on the very Self-Serving Bias that his forces were largely indestructible and his fort, impregnable, while that of his enemies were inferior. Of course, most history buffs would already have known this but hey, its still great to be able to witness his downfall, literally! Hopefully, we are all now able to better appreciate the movie equipped with these new knowledge!

... Stay tuned for more posts!